Key Points
- The hype around new lasers needs to be looked at with a clear head and a somewhat skeptical eye so doctors don't get too overzealous.
LAST WEEK, I PICKED UP a respected laser journal and saw two well-written articles detailing nine cases of significant complications — any of which,
in a given situation, could trigger the volatile combination of a litigious patient and a welcoming plaintiff attorney.
With the advent of fractional laser resurfacing and the related hype by both industry and clinicians, most seasoned laser
practitioners have been waiting for the first wave of complication reports. I believe that these articles represent only the
tip of the iceberg and there are scores of unreported complications from fractional laser resurfacing. I am aware of numerous
cases in litigation and have more and more colleagues commenting on this increase.
LASER ALLURE So why is anyone surprised? As with all new technologies, manufacturers, media, surgeons and patients are excited at the possibility
of "more results with less downtime." We have seen this hype many times with many different devices and techniques including
barbed threads, "miracle" facelifts, nonsurgical skin tightening devices and yes, lasers. Especially lasers! There is something
appealing about laser technology as it truly represents "space age physics," which most baby boomers had ingrained in their
lives from Sputnik to the moon walk. It is technology in its purest form. Patients are fascinated with laser treatments as
are physicians. The manufacturers and the media fully realize this laser preoccupation and it is always newsworthy. Again,
the root of the problem.
I am a stubborn, change-resistant, CO2 ablative laser practitioner who still treats significant numbers of happy patients with traditional high-energy, multipass
CO2 laser resurfacing. I have been put off, if not offended, that my treatments and I have been mocked and criticized as being
"old school" and dangerous because of increased downtime and the possibility of such complications of hypopigmentation, extended
erythema and scarring. The same people making those claims were touting the vast benefits of fractional laser resurfacing
and its extreme safety, fast recovery and "CO2-like results." Somehow it seems that the "gold standard" also got changed. RECOVERY VS. RESULTS Lasers remain a big part of my practice and clinical interests and I own a number of them — including a fractional system.
Not that the experiences of a single practitioner dictate communal experience, but I have basically failed to see the huge
differences in decreased downtime and increased results with fractional lasers, and I have written about this numerous times.
To encapsulate my experience in a single phrase: expectations exceed results!
I am not saying there is no value in fractional laser resurfacing, and it may be the future of laser treatment, but "we ain't
there yet." I continue to see case presentation of results that herald a three to four day recovery, but in small print state
that there were four treatment sessions. Not much of an advantage to a single aggressive CO2 laser treatment in my book. We are creating a culture based on hype where patients and novice practitioners think that it
is a sin for a patient to reverse decades of aging with a two-week recovery and some extended erythema. They think that patients
won't accept such treatment plans in this day and age and that they can circumvent the drawbacks of recovery with new technology.
Not true. When it is explained to a patient that they can in fact have "the real gold standard" for rhytid and scar effacement
and dyschromia ablation — but it will require a longer recovery, the tradeoff is not an obstacle.
DR. DUBIOUS Finally, why should we be surprised that these "conservative" lasers can cause complications? A laser is a laser is a laser.
Concentrated light energy, regardless of the platform, has the ability to destroy tissue to depths that cannot re-epithelialize.
Most of us have all said the laser prayer: "God, get me through this and I will never do that again!" None of us are beyond
complications and it goes with the territory. However, we all must embrace cutting-edge technology with some skepticism and
remember the hard-learned lessons of days past. New technology will happen, new doors will be opened and someday, the thought
of burning someone's skin off to improve their appearance will sound irrational. Until then, we all need to put some brakes
on the landslide of hype concerning "miracle" lasers. Time will tell, but at what expense? We have been there before; we should
not go there again. Embrace technology, believe half of what you hear, don't forget where we have been, and if something sounds
too good to be true, it probably is.
Joseph Niamtu, D.M.D., is a fellow of the American Academy of Cosmetic Surgery and the American Society for Lasers in Medicine
and Surgery and board certified by the American Board of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Dr. Niamtu, who specializes exclusively
in cosmetic facial surgery, is in private practice in Richmond, Virginia.