ICD-10 deadline sparks battle of titans: AMA vs. CMS - - ModernMedicine
ICD-10 deadline sparks battle of titans: AMA vs. CMS

Source: Medical Economics eConsult

The American Medical Association (AMA) House of Delegates has voted to “work vigorously to stop implementation of ICD-10” by a government-imposed deadline in 2013. But don’t get your hopes up. The smart money probably is on the health agency bureaucrats.

Under current regulations, all Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) entities must adopt the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10), by October 1, 2013. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has left no wiggle room, stating in a provider guide posted in September: “The compliance standards are firm and are not changing.”

The issue came up for a vote at the AMA’s semi-annual meeting in November. “The implementation of ICD-10 will create significant burdens on the practice of medicine with no direct benefit to individual patients’ care,” said Peter W. Carmel, MD, AMA president. “This massive and expensive undertaking will add administrative expense and create unnecessary workflow disruptions. The timing could not be worse as many physicians are working to implement electronic health records into their practices.”

A three-physician practice would spend $83,290 on the conversion, and a 10-physician practice would be out $285,195 to adopt the new codes, said the AMA, drawing on costs calculated by Nachimson Advisors in 2008. The report estimated that between one-half and two-thirds of the total cost of conversion comes from increased documentation costs associated with the five-fold increase in codes used in ICD-10 compared with ICD-9.

The problem is that the United States is almost 20 years late in making the switch. ICD-10 was widely adopted in Europe and elsewhere by 1994. CMS pushed back the date for ICD-10 implementation by 2 years in 2009 but has consistently said that the 2013 deadline is firm. The World Health Organization, which creates the coding systems, has said that an even newer version, ICD-11, will be ready in 2015.

To help practices meet the ICD-10 deadline and minimize costs and disruption associated with the conversion, CMS released four implementation handbooks recently that offer step-by-step guides and customized templates for small- and medium-size  practices, large practices, small hospitals, and payers. The handbooks provide checklists to ensure that practices take the appropriate steps throughout the conversion process, offer timelines to facilitate meeting the October 2013 deadline, and include questions and processes to assess vendor readiness.

Go back to current issue of eConsult

Related Content

8 steps to prepare for transition to ICD-10

How ICD-10 will affect your practice

Guess what? ICD-11 waiting in the wings

post a comment
Your email address will NOT be published.
appears with your comment
read our privacy policy
Note: does not support HTML
All comments submitted are subject to review and may be delayed before posting. We reserve the right not to post comments. Comments from patients or members of patients' families seeking medical advice will not be posted.
Comments from our Readers
 Posted 2012-04-12 15:15:25.0
Can't implement ICD-10 codes without an EHR system and refuse to lay out the money and effort for an EHR system until Congress does something meaningful about stopping the SGR cuts. Lines are being drawn in the sand by private practitioners and we are willing to walk away from the practice of medicine over it. So, too bad, so sad, if you want us to pay for and perform your research, get rid of the SGR or suffer the an even more severe shortage of doctors.
Read More Comments
eSamples check closet
eSamples check closet
Practice ToolsPractice Tools
Coding Counselor
Coding Counselor

Simple and accurate ICD-9 code search. Start Here

Patient Education
Patient Education

Print customized patient education handouts. Start Here

Dermatology Diagnosis
Dermatology Diagnosis

Identify skin diseases by age, gender, location. Start Here

AHRQ Clinical Guidelines
AHRQ Clinical Guidelines

Objective findings on medical interventions. Start Here



Source: Medical Economics eConsult,
Click here